Projekt LoRaWAN: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus Opennet
Thm (Diskussion | Beiträge) (→Protokoll) |
Thm (Diskussion | Beiträge) (→Protokoll) |
||
Zeile 19: | Zeile 19: | ||
* Layer 2 | * Layer 2 | ||
− | |||
** Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink. | ** Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink. | ||
** Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway. | ** Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway. |
Version vom 14. März 2018, 11:08 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Knowledge LoRa / LoRa-WAN
Einsatzmöglichkeiten
- Low Energy, low throughput, high bandwidth, long range Übertragung
- Beispiel Sensordaten
- Über LoRa-WAN auch Anbindung ans Internet, im Idealfall überall, dazu Gateways notwendig
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Things_Network stellt solche Gateways als Community bereit
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cIGzwH-NI8
Protokoll
- Layer 1 - Chirp Spread Spectrum
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirp_Spread_Spectrum
- In Europa Frequenzen 433 MHz (ISM-Band Region 1) und 868 MHz (SRD-Band Europa)
- Reichweiten von 2 km (Stadtgebiet) über 15 km (Vororte) bis zu 40 km (ländliche Gebiete)
- Layer 2
- Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink.
- Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway.
- Bi-directional end-devices with maximal receive slots (Class C): End-devices of Class C have nearly continuously open receive windows, only closed when transmitting. Class C end-device will use more power to operate than Class A or Class B but they offer the lowest latency for server to end-device communication.
- Layer 3
- https://www.lora-alliance.org/for-developers
- LoRa-WAN ist eine Möglichkeit, ein Low Power Wide Area Network zu errichten
Hardware
Gateways
Mobilgeräte
Plan
Standorte
Bei 2km Reichweite in Städten würden wir mit den ersten drei Gateways schon die komplette Innenstadt abdecken.